The Finger Lakes are home to a sizable cohort of citizens dedicated to keeping the region clean, environmentally balanced, and, above all, a good place to live. I’ve been impressed with these community-minded folks since my earliest days writing this column.
After almost 15 years, I remain impressed.
I am constantly reminded how lucky we are to have this consistent cadre of alert citizen activists in our communities. Too often local governments, state agencies, and various elected representatives have been unable — or unwilling — to effectively deal with challenges to their authority launched by corporations with deep pockets that employ high-powered legal talent to bully their way to official approvals. Some of these companies also are willing to ignore the dictates of state regulatory agencies such as the Department of Environmental Conservation.
And they do.
Time and time again, citizens have jumped in to pressure governments and regulators to do the right thing: to keep the region clean, environmentally balanced, and a good place to live. Their persistence has paid off, continues to pay off, and benefits us all.
My first exposure to these dedicated citizens came during the early days of a scheme to fill unlined salt caverns with liquid propane gas near Watkins Glen. Texas-based Inergy did a slick sales job on local government officials, the public, and even DEC, promising jobs, economic growth, and a raft of ancillary benefits. But they failed to mention numerous dangers and serious potential issues that sharp-eyed citizens spotted at a glance. It took more than a decade of legal wrangling, protests, arrests, court trials, and a blizzard of media coverage before the project was scrapped.
It was a victory for the people.
Which brings us to “The people vs. Seneca Meadows Inc.”
This is not a real court case. It’s a phrase I use when pondering the consistent clashes between SMI along Route 414 in Seneca Falls and the public.
Citizens routinely go to town meetings to file complaints and demand action, hold protest marches, and publicly complain on these news pages and in letters to the editor about foul odors that trigger gagging, pollution, truck traffic, and potential threats to health that include cancer. If this was an actual legal case, it might rival Charles Dickens’ famous fictional case Jarndyce v. Jarndyce from his novel “Bleak House.”
In recent weeks, Syracuse added its official city council voice to the opposition. The Common Council said it is concerned about truck traffic and Skaneateles Lake, the source of unfiltered drinking water to more than 200,000 people in Skaneateles, surrounding communities, and Syracuse itself. The council also asked to be an official “interested party” in consideration of the permit application.
The court of public opinion’s verdict is clear. The massive landfill should shut down at the end of 2025. Its proposed 47-acre, seven-story-high expansion should be turned down without further adieu.
In a recent hearing before the town board of Seneca Falls, nearly every citizen who spoke asked the board to deny an operating permit for the landfill. The board listened but has yet to vote yay or nay.
SMI and its corporate parent understandably want to roll over public opposition and keep stacking 6,000 tons of detritus per day for 15 years to continue to making its profit. But the region should not have to suffer another decade-plus of landfill growth and negative impacts.
Town board members should listen and deny the permit.
The DEC should listen and tell SMI “no more.”
And, SMI should listen, too, and start the process of shutting down Seneca Meadows.
The court of public opinion has ruled.